spend
$3,172.80
tokens
7.1B tokens
models
23 models
what they pay for
$365.00/mo
Self-reported. Nothing here is checked against a provider.
summary
tools
4 tools
where the money went
| bucket | tokens | cost | share |
|---|---|---|---|
| cache read | 6.8B | $1,769 | 55.8% |
| cache write | 131.8M | $1,081 | 34.1% |
| output | 15.9M | $255 | 8.1% |
| input | 127.9M | $67.54 | 2.1% |
89.8% of this is cache, not completions. Context being re-read each turn, rather than anything typed or generated.
cache reuse
51.5:1
6.8B tokens read back for every 131.8M written. Writing to cache costs 1.25–2× the input rate; reading costs a tenth. Higher is better.
Median is 59.5:1 across 5 people. You are in the 20th percentile. At the median you would have spent about $146 less.
Reuse drops when context is rebuilt: starting fresh sessions, clearing history, or editing an early turn, which invalidates everything cached after it.
the same tokens, priced elsewhere
| model | total | vs yours | effective | in | out | cache read |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| your mix · 23 models · 7.1B tokens | $3,173 | — | $0.449 | |||
| haiku-4-5 · used | $1,130 | −$2,043 64% | $0.160 | $1.00 | $5.00 | $0.100 |
| gpt-5.2 | $2,061 | −$1,112 35% | $0.292 | $1.75 | $14.00 | $0.175 |
| sonnet-5 · used | $2,260 | −$913 29% | $0.320 | $2.00 | $10.00 | $0.200 |
| gemini-3-pro | $2,291 | −$881 28% | $0.325 | $2.00 | $12.00 | $0.200 |
| opus-5 · used | $5,649 | +$2,476 78% | $0.800 | $5.00 | $25.00 | $0.500 |
| opus-4-8 · used | $5,649 | +$2,476 78% | $0.800 | $5.00 | $25.00 | $0.500 |
| fable-5-1 · used | $6,210 | +$3,038 96% | $0.880 | $10.00 | $50.00 | $0.250 |
USD per million tokens. Effective applies each rate card to your own mix, the only comparison that holds when cache reads are 55.8% of the bill. Published rates only: a weaker model often needs more turns, and those are not counted.